AI-Powered Case Assessment for Modern Litigation

Once a judge told our team that estimating the value of a claim is an art, not a science. Well, we have discovered it is very much a science.

For decades, the legal industry has operated under the assumption that case valuation requires intuition, experience, and a healthy dose of educated guesswork. But this subjective judgment alone is no longer sufficient. The stakes are too high, the cases too intricate, and the consequences of miscalculation too severe to rely on traditional methods.

The Problem with Traditional Case Evaluation

Today's plaintiff attorneys face a stark reality: they're deciding which cases to take on based on limited information. One attorney might receive a valuation for a class action of $2 million, while another estimates $8 million for the same case. 

This inconsistency stems from the lack of a standardized framework for risk assessment. Without consistent methodologies, attorneys are essentially operating in the dark, making critical decisions that affect their clients' futures and their firms' success based on incomplete information.

The Cost of Guesswork

The consequences of this approach ripple throughout the entire legal system. Plaintiffs attorneys find themselves making decisions without concrete data, potentially missing lucrative opportunities or investing significant resources in cases with poor prospects. 

The human cost cannot be ignored either. Time to justice is delayed by inaccurate assessments, leaving clients in limbo while cases that should settle quickly drag on for months or years. The financial implications are equally severe, with law firms hemorrhaging resources on cases that could have been evaluated more accurately from the start.

Ready for Smarter Case Selection? Contact Us.

Darrow's Data-Driven Approach to Case Assessment

We've spent the past five years building a robust dataset and library of over 200,000 relevant cases that are standardized and enriched by our proprietary AI models. These models are continuously refined and validated against insights from industry experts, ensuring that case assessments are both accurate and actionable.

Our team of legal experts, data scientists, and product developers has created numerous patent-pending methodologies that analyze relevant case details, including cause of action, damages, defendant, jurisdiction and more, to deliver objective, accurate valuations. Instead of relying on guesswork, we use historical case outcomes and statistical models to generate specific settlement predictions and realistic probabilities of case outcomes.

Why We're Different

Unlike traditional strategies, we train and optimize AI models to extract meaningful insights from complex legal data at scale. Our AI systems are purpose-built to recognize patterns in litigation outcomes, identify hidden variables that influence value, and continuously learn from new data as it enters the system. This means every evaluation benefits from the full weight of past case intelligence, refined by machine learning and sharpened by human insight.

Our underwriters deliver three components that traditional evaluation methods cannot match:

• Expected settlement calculations: We use historical data and predictive models to provide concrete settlement figures, replacing vague ranges and gut-based estimates with data-driven precision.
  
  
• Probability of settlement: Through comprehensive risk analysis, we give attorneys a clear picture of their chances for success, helping them make more informed strategic decisions.
  
  
• Sensitivity mapping: We generate detailed scenario analyses that show how different factors might impact a case’s value, enabling legal teams to plan around uncertainty with greater confidence.

Beyond this, we provide detailed class size, damages, and expected attorney fees. We ensure consistency and repeatability across all evaluations, while our transparent processes can be verified and explained to clients, courts, or opposing counsel. Most importantly, our data-backed benchmarking against comparable cases provides objective analysis that removes guesswork from legal decisions.

Smarter case selection allows firms to focus their efforts on the most promising opportunities. The risk of taking on unprofitable cases decreases, helping firms avoid costly missteps. Clear, data-backed communication also strengthens client relationships by setting realistic expectations and building trust.

Speed and Efficiency Gains

Where traditional assessment might take weeks, we’re able to deliver accurate case evaluations in a fraction of the time. The process is also scalable and extends to entire case portfolios, allowing firms to evaluate multiple opportunities simultaneously. Faster reporting and documentation eliminate the tedious manual processes that consume valuable attorney time.

With accessible pricing designed for firms of all sizes, even solo practitioners can access institutional-quality case analysis.

Lastly, this data-based method to case evaluation ensures superior accuracy and consistency. Predictions replace subjective opinions, while standardized methodologies ensure every assessment meets the same rigorous standards. Historical validation of our prediction accuracy provides confidence that our assessments reflect real-world outcomes.

The Future is Data-Driven

Plaintiffs’ firms can now gain access to objective analysis that improves case selection, strengthens negotiation positions, and reduces the risk of costly misjudgments. 

The judge who called case evaluation an art wasn't entirely wrong; there is artistry in legal practice. But that artistry is enhanced when supported by rigorous scientific analysis. Human judgment combined with the power of technology doesn't just improve case evaluation, but it transforms the practice of law itself.

Why Gamble on Case Value? Let the Data Decide. Contact Us to Evaluate Your Case with Confidence.