Legal Funding Journal covers Darrow's expansion of PlaintiffLink, its plaintiff-connecting platform, to support the specific demands of mass arbitration — one of the most logistically complex and capital-intensive areas of plaintiff-side litigation.
Mass arbitration presents a distinctive challenge for law firms: to pursue these cases effectively, attorneys need to connect with tens of thousands of individual claimants, vet them for eligibility, and manage them through a coordinated filing process — all before a single arbitration is filed. The barrier has historically been both operational and financial. PlaintiffLink addresses both directly.
The platform gives attorneys a centralized portal through which they can plan, review, and approve potential clients at scale. It provides data-driven insights to support filing strategies and streamlined case management, and it operates on a contingency model that shifts financial risk away from the law firm. At the time of launch, tens of thousands of plaintiffs had already been vetted on the platform.
The technical infrastructure is built to handle the volume. Attorneys can drill down into specific claim cohorts, download raw data on individual claims, and access visual and statistical analysis through insight reports. A two-tier vetting process is built in to reduce invalid claims and streamline client acquisition before filings begin.
CTO and co-founder Gila Hayat described the product as enabling attorneys to gain visibility into client cohorts within a single matter — a capability that makes it practical to file and manage the kind of large-scale arbitrations that would otherwise be operationally unworkable for most firms.
CEO Evya Ben Artzi framed the launch as an expression of Darrow's broader mission: connecting victims with the law firms best positioned to help them, even in the most complex matters.
